The naughty nun – a raunchy engraving from 1555

I came over this thrilling little engraving some time ago. After some discussions around this picture I decided to make an image analysis of what we acctually see in this picture and what it represents:

YH3mfHh

We see a slightly depressed looking nun trying to bribe the housecat with a fish as an exchange for an extremely erected penis the cat is running around with.  In the background we see an amused fool flaunting a pair of male underpants. The quote on the bottom reads “Flaisch match Flaisch” which translates into either “flesh gives flesh” or “flesh equals flesh”. This depiction is found in the Rijkmuseum in Netherlands, artist unknown and with the description “Nun walks with fish in hand chasing a cat , she wants to trade the fish with a penis that the cat has in its mouth. A jester watches through a window frame”.

Obviously this is a humorous satire with a very naughty message: driven by her carnal desires the nun wants to get her hands on the erected penis and tries to bribe it from the cat. The quote “Flaisch match Flaisch” can possible be connected to german wordgames: the word “fleisch” can be tied the german word “Fleischlust”, with the same meaning as “desires of the flesh”, showing that the nun have sexual reasons for hunting the cats prey. Also the german word “Fleisch” is a slang for, well, the penis. Simply put: the nun wants the bratwurst! But why does she use specifically a fish to bribe the cat? It could either be derived from the catolic medieval practice of eating fish on fridays. Or its simply a clever trick as fish is a wellknown favourite dish for felines.

snusknunnaBut what does the engraving actually mean? Well, when looking at the date of production – 1555 – its quite clear. This is in the middle of the Reformation spreading over Europe. It is obvious that this is a protestant satire – a example of popular protestant criticism of catholic practices. These satires portrayed Catholics in celibacy (cleric, nuns and monks) as secular, perverted and driven by carnal desires. This derives from one of the key pillars of Protestantism: criticism of the celibacy. Protestants claimed that the catholic idea of celibacy was a fraud – celibacy instead resulted in corrupted perverts doing nothing but hunting sexual outlets. The protestant idea was instead that marital intercourse was God given and therefor natural. Celibacy on the other hand was an unnatural concept and not even supported by the bible! Making popular caricatures of Catholics like this woodcut was a weapon in the political war.

Back to the engraving – this is a caricature meant to show the viewer the catholic hypocricy. Lacking martital sexual outlet the nun is perversely obsessed with sex. All the vows of celibacy are soon forgotten as soon as a chance for “meat” is presented. Please also note the rosary the nun is wearing…. what do we see there, instead of a crucifix?

But why is the fool in the background? Often in medieval and early modern depictions the fool is a symbol for mockery, stupidity or someone being fooled. Maybe he is there to show us this is a satire. But why is he smugly wagging his underpants? Is it to show the nun that he is available for action if she doesn’t get a hold of the cats prey? Or is it perhaps to show us that it is the fools private parts the cat is running around with? This is all just up for guessing unfortunately… What do you think?

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “The naughty nun – a raunchy engraving from 1555

  1. Pingback: The naughty nun – a raunchy woodcut from 1555 | littlefootbigstep's Blog

  2. My first impression was that the penis was actually a wooden dildo and being that it was probably used liberally (Given the celibacy and all that) the joke here was that it smelled like a woman’s vagina (which some people say smells like a fish) hence her trying to pull the old switcharoo with a dead fish.

    Also, I am really trying to wrap my head around how those underpants work since one side of them appears to be untied, do they tie up on each side? I have no freaking clue how ye olde underwear worked!

    Like

    • Thanks for your comment and thoughts around this, Zachary. I think its a very entertaining way of looking at the engraving – although I do think that interpretation is quite modern 😀 This engraving was most surely made as a political/religious statement & referring to dildos & vagina-odours might be slightly to over the top for a early modern viewer, even in this context. But I like how you reason! 😀

      About the male underpants its exactly like you say – you only tie them on one side. Why they didnt choose to have knots on both sides i don’t know – my guess is that this is an early version of the “pocket” we see on modern male underpants – simply for easier access when nature calls! 😀

      I hope you didnt miss my entry on the subject: https://vulgarcrowd.wordpress.com/2015/08/20/why-the-langberg-finds-are-not-knickers/

      All my best!

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s